Codevanced | Mocking frameworks comparison
I don’t think that the most promising ideas are on the horizon. They are already here and have been here for years but are not being used properly.
benalabaster:
“Reading Mocking frameworks comparison http://bit.ly/3jYGOe ”
Nov 11, 2009
view tweet
retweet
yamasasHighly Influential:
“[resources] Codevanced | Mocking frameworks comparison http://bit.ly/3JTXE1 ”
Oct 30, 2009
view tweet
retweet
halllo:
“"As Isolator,Moles uses CLR profiler to intercept method calls-thus being able to mock static methods" http://bit.ly/eIXPI (@DonalDevine) ”
Oct 25, 2009
view tweet
retweet
shawnfumo:
“RT @rickasaurus An excellent comparison of .NET Mocking Frameworks http://is.gd/42Oht ”
Oct 7, 2009
view tweet
retweet
nohzInfluential:
“RT @elijahmanor: "Mocking Frameworks Comparison" #tech #testing http://j.mp/152M4b ”
Oct 6, 2009
view tweet
retweet
elijahmanorHighly Influential:
“"Mocking Frameworks Comparison" #tech #testing http://j.mp/152M4b ”
Oct 6, 2009
view tweet
retweet
bellwareHighly Influential:
“fails to recognize design and productivity retardation as a con for typemock http://is.gd/3Z69J ”
Oct 5, 2009
view tweet
retweet
emilcardell:
“RT @RoyOsherove: RT @kzu: updated Mocking Frameworks: Comparison at http://bit.ly/12oavv #isolator #nMock2 #moles #moq #rhinoMocks ”
Oct 5, 2009
view tweet
retweet