Network
Rejection improves eventual impact of manuscripts
A study of papers’ histories from submission to publication unearths unexpected patterns.
All posts about this link
All posts about this link
What doesn't kill you makes you stronger - papers get more citations if they were initially rejected http://t.co/tQohAwLf
Rejection improves eventual impact of manuscripts: http://t.co/TJkvdYqWJU
@Namnezia Absolutely. Kind of the same idea of "Rejection improves eventual impact of manuscripts" http://t.co/f8qt5EMe
Good news! Rejected manuscripts often more cited than those accepted first: http://t.co/mhqYaKNW
"It's a long way to the top..."Rejection improves eventual impact of manuscripts http://t.co/h0NcUaHg
more citations for papers initially rejected? After all peer-review makes your paper better http://t.co/3USX4EXX
Just had your paper rejected? Don’t worry — that might boost its ultimate citation tally, finds new study: http://t.co/gidPn473
